Welcome back. I’m Adeline Atlas, 11-time published author, and this is The Dissolving the Family Structure Series. In this first video, we go back to the beginning—not the beginning of the family, but the beginning of its targeting. This isn’t a modern accident. The dismantling of the nuclear family is a calculated and historically repeated pattern. Because the family, when intact, is the final decentralized power structure that resists total control.

If you want to dominate a society, you don’t start with the economy. You don’t start with laws. You start by breaking the bond that protects people from the need to depend on the state in the first place. You destroy the family.

Let’s go back to Stalin’s Soviet Union. In the 1920s and 30s, the Communist regime openly targeted traditional families. Children were encouraged to report their parents for “anti-revolutionary” beliefs. Schools taught state values, not family values. The father, once the protector and provider, was replaced by the government. The mother was removed from the home and put into the workforce. Marriage was de-emphasized. The state became husband, teacher, and god.

Now jump to Maoist China. Under Mao Zedong, family loyalty was seen as a threat to loyalty to the Communist Party. Children were not taught to obey their parents—they were taught to obey the Party. During the Cultural Revolution, countless youth turned against their elders. Generational bonds were broken. Grandparents were mocked. Lineage was erased. Why? Because loyalty to blood was competition for loyalty to the system.

And then, there’s fiction that wasn’t fiction for long. Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World envisioned a world where the family didn’t exist at all. Babies were engineered in hatcheries. Words like “mother” and “father” were considered obscene. People belonged to the state, not to each other. There was no emotional attachment, no marriage, no lineage. Just controlled pleasure, sterilized reproduction, and programmed compliance.

These weren’t random stories or historical footnotes. They were blueprints. Because when families are strong, the state is weak. When fathers are present, systems of control don’t penetrate. When mothers nurture with discernment and grounding, propaganda fails. When children are raised in stable homes, identity is anchored, and outside influence has to work harder. In short—when the family is intact, programming doesn’t work.

And this is why the nuclear family—father, mother, child—is hated by systems that seek total compliance. It creates loyalty outside the system. It creates meaning that can’t be legislated. It creates bonds that algorithms can’t replicate. And that’s dangerous to power.

Let’s talk about why the nuclear family is ungovernable. First, it decentralizes support. Families feed each other. Households protect each other. They solve problems internally. This means fewer people turning to government welfare, fewer dependents for the system to manipulate. If your father protects your home, you don’t need the police. If your spouse meets your emotional needs, you don’t need state therapists. If your children are raised in moral structure, you don’t need ideological education.

Second, it decentralizes values. When families teach their own children, those children grow up with personalized, often spiritual worldviews—not standardized ideological beliefs. That’s a threat to centralized control. The state prefers education systems that manufacture one type of human—obedient, uncertain, dependent. A child raised in a strong family sees through that. They have internal anchors. They have identity. They’re not programmable.

And third, the family decentralizes reproduction. The state cannot manufacture legacy. It cannot produce generations loyal to each other, only loyal to it. But the nuclear family does. It builds dynasty. It builds legacy. It passes down memory, wisdom, traditions, and protection. It creates spiritual and material continuity—and this is something control systems cannot replicate.

So if the goal is total control, the family must be dissolved. How? Not through war—but through policy. And this brings us into modern times.

Let’s talk about taxation. In many countries today, including Western democracies, the tax system punishes marriage. Dual-income married couples often pay more than single parents or cohabiting couples. Incentives are given for single motherhood, not for marital commitment. Financial pressure is used to fragment homes—not hold them together.

Look at child protective services. CPS exists for a reason—but it’s also a tool. In many jurisdictions, children can be removed from homes not for abuse, but for ideological non-compliance. Families that homeschool, reject certain medical treatments, or practice spiritual beliefs outside the mainstream are now targets for investigation. The message is clear: the child belongs to the state, not to the parents.

And then there’s education policy. State-run schools have slowly but surely eroded parental authority. Children are taught to question their parents' beliefs, especially on gender, politics, spirituality, and culture. In many places, parents can no longer opt their children out of ideologically charged curriculums. And now, in some regions, schools can transition a child’s gender identity without even notifying the parents. This is not education. This is replacement.

The modern state, backed by corporate and technological power, no longer attacks the family with open force. It doesn’t need to. It attacks with algorithms, with incentives, with shame, and with isolation. Fathers are ridiculed. Mothers are overwhelmed. Children are medicated. And all of it happens slowly—quietly—so that by the time it becomes visible, it's already normalized.

But make no mistake. This is war. A silent war against the most ancient institution humanity has ever known. And it is effective because people forgot what the family really is.

The family is not a convenience. It’s not just a lifestyle choice. It is a spiritual structure, a biological shield, and a psychological fortress. When it is intact, people thrive. When it is shattered, people drift. And that drift is what makes centralized control possible.

We are not seeing the collapse of the family. We are seeing its removal—systematic, deliberate, and strategic. Because the family is the last rebellion. It is the final frontier of autonomy. And when it stands, the system cannot win.

In the videos to come, we’ll show how this dissolution has unfolded—through the removal of fathers, the incentivizing of single motherhood, the weaponization of gender roles, and the technological replacement of parental function. We’ll also show what can be done to rebuild—not just practically, but spiritually.

Because while they may control the systems, they cannot own the soul. And it is the soul that remembers what family really means.

This is Dissolving the Family Structure. And this was just the beginning.