The Last Biological Humans By Adeline Atlas
May 28, 2025
Welcome to the most uncomfortable truth of the 21st century: humanity is not disappearingâbut biological humans are. In this series, weâre not talking about extinction in the traditional sense. Weâre talking about replacement. Conversion. Transformation. Weâre talking about the end of natural reproduction, the collapse of organic fertility, and the phase-out of the last generation born from unaltered biology. We call them âlegacy humansââand if you're watching this, you're likely one of them.
This series is titled Depopulation: The Last Biological Humans for a reason. Itâs not a conspiracy theory or a fringe belief. Itâs a measurable trend happening in real-time across nearly every continent. Fertility is falling. Birth rates are crashing. Entire nations are aging beyond recovery. And for the first time in human history, the cause is not famine, war, or disease. It's us. Our technology, our lifestyles, our policiesâand perhaps even our design.
But before we dive into the science, the politics, and the unsettling future scenarios, letâs make something clear. This series covers serious subject matter. Deep demographic change. Reproductive collapse. The potential redesign of the human species. And existential questions about what happens when the body becomes optional. If at any point this information feels overwhelming, take a break. Talk to someone you trust. Use discernment. These are not light topicsâand theyâre not meant to be. Weâre here to examine whatâs actually happening, not to sanitize it.
And one more thing: Iâm not here to tell you what to believe. This series isnât propaganda. Itâs research. Itâs pattern recognition. Itâs investigative analysis of what many refuse to acknowledge because it challenges their assumptions about progress. So if you're here, it means you're willing to think beyond slogans. You're ready to look at the hard data and ask: where is this all heading?
Letâs start with a basic definition. What is depopulation?
The mainstream definition of depopulation is simple: a decline in the number of people living in a particular area. But in this series, weâre refining that definition. When we say depopulation, weâre not talking about total human disappearance. Weâre talking about the systematic declineâand eventual obsolescenceâof natural, biological reproduction. The end of human life as something born. And the beginning of human life as something built.
This distinction matters because humanity, in many ways, is still continuing. People are living longer. Some are merging with machines. Others are pursuing digital immortality through consciousness backups, AI avatars, or cryogenic storage. But none of that requires a womb. None of that continues the lineage of natural humans. Whatâs growing is not human fertilityâbut post-human continuity.
Which brings us to Elon Musk.
For years, Musk has warned that âpopulation collapse due to low birth rates is a much bigger risk to civilization than global warming.â Heâs not alone. Demographers, governments, and tech leaders are all starting to acknowledge that we are not having enough children to sustain our current civilization. Countries like Japan, South Korea, and Italy are already past the point of recovery. Their fertility rates are below 1.0. That means, on average, each generation is producing less than half of the next.
And hereâs the kicker: no country in recorded history has ever reversed a fertility rate that low. Once a population begins to decline, it tends to keep decliningâunless something radical intervenes. And as youâll see later in this series, something radical is intervening. But itâs not nature. Itâs not policy. Itâs technology.
We are moving from birth to manufacturing.
In the coming chapters, weâll examine how artificial wombs, synthetic sperm, and CRISPR gene editing are beginning to replace the need for sexual reproduction. The very act of creating life is being moved out of the homeâand into the lab. And if that makes you uncomfortable, it should. Because weâre not just replacing biology with better biology. Weâre replacing birth with fabrication.
But before we get there, we have to understand how we got here. And that begins with what some researchers are calling âSpermageddon.â
Since the 1970s, global sperm counts have dropped by more than 50%. Thatâs not speculationâitâs peer-reviewed science. Chemicals like PFAS, phthalates, and endocrine disruptors are now found in over 90% of human blood samples. These are not harmless. They interfere with hormone function, disrupt testicular development, and reduce fertility across both men and women. And while women are also experiencing declining egg quality and higher rates of reproductive disorders, itâs the male side of the equation thatâs collapsing fastest.
Dr. Shanna Swan, one of the worldâs leading environmental reproductive epidemiologists, predicts that the median sperm count could hit zero by 2045. Zero. That means the average man could become functionally infertile in just two decades. And yet, public awareness remains virtually nonexistent. Why?
Because fertility collapse doesnât make noise. It doesnât riot. It doesnât burn. It just fades.
Now, you might be thinkingâcanât we just use IVF? Sperm donors? Adoption? In theory, yes. But that response misses the point. Once we lose the ability to reproduce biologically at scale, we lose more than just population. We lose independence. We lose agency. And we become permanently dependent on medical systems and private industries to continue our species.
Which leads to the next uncomfortable question: who profits from all of this?
The global fertility industry is projected to hit $42 billion by 2030. Big Pharma, biotech startups, and private clinics are racing to offer the next generation of fertility âsolutionsââfrom gene-edited embryos to artificial womb facilities like EctoLife. Meanwhile, corporate culture is incentivizing childlessness. Employees without kids are promoted faster. They work longer hours. They cost less. In some sectors, children are now considered a liabilityânot a legacy.
And ideologically, something else is happening. A narrative is being pushed that having kids is selfish. That children are bad for the environment. That parenthood is outdated. Combined with lifestyle marketing that glamorizes freedom, travel, and self-optimization, you have an entire generation thatâs been psychologically disincentivized from reproducing. And for many, itâs already too late.
The truth is, weâre not just experiencing depopulation.
Weâre participating in it.
Whether by choice, coercion, or circumstance, biological humans are phasing themselves out. And no one is talking about what comes after.
Thatâs what this series is for.
In the videos that follow, weâll explore:
- Why secular societies have fewer children
- How artificial children may replace real ones by 2050
- Whether governments will start mandating reproduction
- And what it means to be âthe last generationâ born through natural means
Weâll look at countries already disappearing demographicallyâlike South Korea, Japan, and Chinaâand ask: Can culture survive without birth? Can nations exist without children? And can the human soul endure if reproduction becomes a product, not a miracle?
You donât have to agree with everything in this series. In fact, you shouldnât. This is a topic that demands critical thinking. What weâre laying out is a framework for understanding one of the most profound transitions in human history. Not from life to deathâbut from birth to construction.
So if youâve ever wondered why so many people seem to be opting out of parenthoodâŚ
If youâve noticed fertility clinics booming while birth announcements shrinkâŚ
If youâve felt like something deeper is happening to the human story, something beyond economics or personal choiceâŚ
Youâre not imagining it.
The age of biology is ending. The age of engineered existence is beginning.
And you are living through the crossover.
Letâs begin.